Uncertainty matters: ascertaining where specimens in natural history collections come from and its implications for predicting species distributions

dc.contributor.author Marcer, Arnald ca
dc.contributor.author Chapman, Arthur D. ca
dc.contributor.author Wieczorek, John R. ca
dc.contributor.author Picó, Francesc X. ca
dc.contributor.author Uribe, Francesc ca
dc.contributor.author Waller, John ca
dc.contributor.author Ariño, Arturo H. ca
dc.contributor.other Consorci del Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona ca
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-07T14:12:40Z
dc.date.available 2022-12-07T14:12:40Z
dc.date.issued 2022-06
dc.description.abstract Natural history collections (NHCs) represent an enormous and largely untapped wealth of information on the Earth's biota, made available through GBIF as digital preserved specimen records. Precise knowledge of where the specimens were collected is paramount to rigorous ecological studies, especially in the field of species distribution modelling. Here, we present a first comprehensive analysis of georeferencing quality for all preserved specimen records served by GBIF, and illustrate the impact that coordinate uncertainty may have on predicted potential distributions. We used all GBIF preserved specimen records to analyse the availability of coordinates and associated spatial uncertainty across geography, spatial resolution, taxonomy, publishing institutions and collection time. We used three plant species across their native ranges in different parts of the world to show the impact of uncertainty on predicted potential distributions. We found that 38% of the 180+ million records provide coordinates only and 18% coordinates and uncertainty. Georeferencing quality is determined more by country of collection and publishing than by taxonomic group. Distinct georeferencing practices are more determinant than implicit characteristics and georeferencing difficulty of specimens. Availability and quality of records contrasts across world regions. Uncertainty values are not normally distributed but peak at very distinct values, which can be traced back to specific regions of the world. Uncertainty leads to a wide spectrum of range sizes when modelling species distributions, potentially affecting conclusions in biogeographical and climate change studies. In summary, the digitised fraction of the world's NHCs are far from optimal in terms of georeferencing and quality mainly depends on where the collections are hosted. A collective effort between communities around NHC institutions, ecological research and data infrastructure is needed to bring the data on a par with its importance and relevance for ecological research. ca
dc.format.extent 17 p. ca
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/2072/522462
dc.identifier.entitat consorcis ca
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11703/127741
dc.language eng ca
dc.provenance Recercat (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya) ca
dc.rights CC-BY ca
dc.rights.notes © 2022 The Authors. Ecography published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Society Oikos ca
dc.subject Col·leccions de ciències naturals ca
dc.subject Biogeografia ca
dc.subject Dades geoespacials ca
dc.subject GBIF ca
dc.subject Col·leccions de ciències naturals en
dc.subject Biogeography en
dc.subject Geospatial data en
dc.subject GBIF en
dc.subject Col·leccions de ciències naturals es
dc.subject Biogeografía es
dc.subject Geospatial data es
dc.subject GBIF es
dc.subject.category Ciència i tecnologia ca
dc.subject.forma articles ca
dc.title Uncertainty matters: ascertaining where specimens in natural history collections come from and its implications for predicting species distributions ca
dc.type text ca
dc.type.driver info:eu-repo/semantics/article ca
dc.type.driver info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion ca
metadadalocal.dependencia 8008920

Apareix a les col·leccions

Fitxers