Climatic niche characteristics of native and invasive Lilium lancifolium

Impact

Altmetric

Export to

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11703/120567
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHerrando-Moraira, Soniaca
dc.contributor.authorNualart, Neusca
dc.contributor.authorHerrando-Moraira, Albertca
dc.contributor.authorChung, Myong Gica
dc.contributor.authorChung, Mi Yoonca
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Pujol, Jordica
dc.contributor.otherConsorci del Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelonaca
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-16T14:53:31Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-16T14:53:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-04-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/2072/374859-
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports 9: 14334ca
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11703/120567-
dc.description.abstractOne of the topics currently under discussion in biological invasions is whether the species’ climatic niche has been conserved or, alternatively, has diverged during invasions. Here, we explore niche dynamic processes using the complex invasion history model of Lilium lancifolium, which is the first tested case of a native species (Korea) with two hypothesized spatial (regional and intercontinental) and temporal arrivals: (1) as an archaeophyte in East Asia (before AD 1500); and (2) as a neophyte in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand (after AD 1500). Following a niche examination through both environmental and geographical spaces, the species in the archaeophyte range has apparently filled the ancestral native niche and, rather, would have increased it considerably. The species as a neophyte shows a closer climatic match with the archaeophyte range than with the native one. This pattern of niche similarity suggests that the neophyte range was probably colonized by a subset of archaeophyte propagules adapted to local climate that promoted the species’ establishment. Overall, niche conservatism is proposed at each colonization step, from native to archaeophyte, and from archaeophyte to neophyte ranges. We detected signals of an advanced invasion stage within the archaeophyte range and traces of an early introduction stage in neophyte ranges.ca
dc.description.abstractOne of the topics currently under discussion in biological invasions is whether the species’ climatic niche has been conserved or, alternatively, has diverged during invasions. Here, we explore niche dynamic processes using the complex invasion history model of Lilium lancifolium, which is the first tested case of a native species (Korea) with two hypothesized spatial (regional and intercontinental) and temporal arrivals: (1) as an archaeophyte in East Asia (before AD 1500); and (2) as a neophyte in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand (after AD 1500). Following a niche examination through both environmental and geographical spaces, the species in the archaeophyte range has apparently filled the ancestral native niche and, rather, would have increased it considerably. The species as a neophyte shows a closer climatic match with the archaeophyte range than with the native one. This pattern of niche similarity suggests that the neophyte range was probably colonized by a subset of archaeophyte propagules adapted to local climate that promoted the species’ establishment. Overall, niche conservatism is proposed at each colonization step, from native to archaeophyte, and from archaeophyte to neophyte ranges. We detected signals of an advanced invasion stage within the archaeophyte range and traces of an early introduction stage in neophyte ranges.en
dc.description.abstractOne of the topics currently under discussion in biological invasions is whether the species’ climatic niche has been conserved or, alternatively, has diverged during invasions. Here, we explore niche dynamic processes using the complex invasion history model of Lilium lancifolium, which is the first tested case of a native species (Korea) with two hypothesized spatial (regional and intercontinental) and temporal arrivals: (1) as an archaeophyte in East Asia (before AD 1500); and (2) as a neophyte in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand (after AD 1500). Following a niche examination through both environmental and geographical spaces, the species in the archaeophyte range has apparently filled the ancestral native niche and, rather, would have increased it considerably. The species as a neophyte shows a closer climatic match with the archaeophyte range than with the native one. This pattern of niche similarity suggests that the neophyte range was probably colonized by a subset of archaeophyte propagules adapted to local climate that promoted the species’ establishment. Overall, niche conservatism is proposed at each colonization step, from native to archaeophyte, and from archaeophyte to neophyte ranges. We detected signals of an advanced invasion stage within the archaeophyte range and traces of an early introduction stage in neophyte ranges.es
dc.format.extent16 p.ca
dc.languageengca
dc.rightsCC-BYca
dc.subjectPlantes invasoresca
dc.subjectLiliàciesca
dc.subjectPlantes invasoresen
dc.subjectLiliaceaeen
dc.subjectPlantes invasoreses
dc.subjectLiliáceases
dc.titleClimatic niche characteristics of native and invasive Lilium lancifoliumca
dc.typetextca
dc.provenanceRecercat (Dipòsit de la Recerca de Catalunya)ca
dc.subject.categoryCiència i tecnologiaca
dc.subject.formaarticlesca
dc.identifier.entitatconsorcisca
dc.rights.notes© The Author(s) 2019ca
metadadalocal.dependencia8008920-
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleca
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionca
Appears in Collections:Institut Botànic de Barcelona / Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


All rights reserved
Metadata ruled by